The operand on the left side of > is the parent and the operand on the right is the children element. Undesirable, yes, but acceptable when you look at the big picture.So, while IE isn’t moving as fast as we all would have liked it to, it *is* coming along.The images in this post are a really neat way to explain exactly how each selector works. This would be especially useful when you’re not sure what container the content will be in, but you need to add a style to that container.Great thanks for the help but tell me is this work on all the browsers….Thanks for the article Chris, it’s very informative.I knew about >, and use it regularly, but I’ve never heard of + and ~.
So you could select the container of an item. I'd say not supported at all in CSS. jQuery can do it:ps. It will hit every li within that ul, no matter if the you use an id/class or not.You would have to style the ol in order to get the nested li’s to change color (which is what Chris has done in the jsbin thing)Yeah, even though the li’s in the ol are not targeted, they inherit the rules that the targeted li in the ul gets. Or highlighting the first item in a list. But there is a difference between I think everyone understands the basic decendent selector, but let’s do a quick overview of the other selectors in this style: the This one we covered in the intro to this article. Too bad...@PaulLedger Did you mean great but NOT well supported?

site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under :-) )Awesome post! And the ie7-js project is very usefull too. The idea being like “select all paragraphs that contain images”. Match the first

element. IE 7 also has support, but be aware that HTML comments can screw them up and cause them to not match when in between siblings.I’ve said it many times before, but one of the major missing selector styles in CSS is some kind of “contains” (or “has” or “qualified” or whatever you want to call it. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Selectors Level 3 The definition of ':first-child' in that specification. CSS Level 2 (Revision 1) The definition of ':first-child' in that specification. While using this site, you agree to have read and accepted our

However, this is a great example why developers accept other means to an end in order to achieve what they want. CSS Selectors. The passed argument may not contain additional selectors or any pseudo-element selectors. In CSS, selectors are patterns used to select the element(s) you want to style. Using a child combinator you can select only those top level list items and not worry about the large/header styling cascading down to the nested lists and having to fight against that styling.These selectors can help you apply styling in a contextual way. Thank for for the efforts.this article AS ALWAYS thought me something that I’ve started to use immediately at a recent project, thanks again Chris !! The subject was going to be the element in the selector chain that would have styles applied to it. Have a look at a blog post I made on DynamicDrive a couple of weeks ago: They are cool selectors and especially useful for styling menu’s. Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkersProgramming & related technical career opportunities But there is a difference between children and descendants. What is proposed though, in the upcoming CSS Level 4 Selectors specification (aka “not CSS4” ), is an extension to the nth-child/nth-last-child pseudo selectors: the ability to add an extra "of S" part into those selectors. Because they are making code easier to read (both css and html).I know I’m late to the ballgame here… But I’ve created a quick post which illustrates a few other fancy I was wondering, why there is adjacent sibling operator, and there is no nth-sibling selector?So what if you want to select only middle p but only after the div.only-after-me (this is currently impossible as I know)?It would be something like this (or I would like to hear suggestion):This does not violate right to left rendering and memory issue, so Im rather curious if this was suggested before to the CSS draft and why it was rejected, and if it was not suggested, why not?Chris, I highly appreciate your work, and would like to hear your opinion and discuss on this topic.Those diagrams are so key for learning the difference between the selectors, it can be very confusing to explain.The related posts above were algorithmically generated and displayed here without any load on my server at all,
The :first-child pseudo-class matches a specified element that is the first child of another element. Why does Google persistently bring me to SO 'duplicate' answers right at the top of the results ranking, rather than the one to which they all refer? Selector ... CSS tutorial: CSS Pseudo classes But some of them start with a